What The Good Numbers Don’t Show You
Hi there,
A few numbers caught my eye this week, and each one told a slightly better story on the surface than underneath it. Confidence is up but investment isn’t. Loyalty schemes are full but affection for the brand often isn’t. Deals are getting rescued, but only when someone can see past the headline figure to what is actually true.
Enjoy!
A rescue deal is still proof the fundamentals mattered
BT has agreed to buy TalkTalk’s broadband business in a £400m deal, part of a package designed to rescue the struggling provider and save around 900 jobs. TalkTalk’s issue was never really reputation. People still bought the service. The problem was a balance sheet that could not keep funding network investment while carrying debt built up over years of price competition. That distinction matters for any owner watching a wobbling competitor and wondering whether to buy, wait or walk away. A business in financial trouble is not automatically a business with a broken model. Sometimes the product and customer relationship are fine, and the thing that needs rescuing is the capital structure underneath it. Buyers who can tell the difference get the better price.
Read the article here.
Foreign buyers have decided British assets are cheap and vulnerable
CNBC reports that hostile takeovers and unsolicited bids for UK-listed companies have surged this year, as a weaker pound and depressed valuations make British assets look like bargains to overseas buyers. This year’s larger deals include McCormick’s $45bn purchase of Unilever’s food business. None of this is really about one sector. It is about a market where owners, boards and advisers have not yet repriced their own businesses to match how cheap they look from outside. If a credible buyer can see value the market hasn’t caught up to, a private owner should be asking the same question before someone else does. Being undervalued is not a compliment. It is an invitation.
Read the article here.
AI will create more jobs than it destroys, eventually
Fortune’s coverage of new McKinsey research suggests AI could destroy around 11 million jobs over time while creating even more elsewhere, but the transition is brutal for the people caught in the gap. McKinsey estimates roughly 770,000 workers a year will need to switch careers entirely, nearly four times the historical average. The hopeful headline and the hard reality both sit in the same report, and that is the honest version of this story. Net job creation is cold comfort to someone whose specific job disappeared this year. For founders, the lesson is to plan for your team’s transition, not just your own adoption curve. The aggregate number is not the experience of the person it happens to.
Read the article here (paywalled, Archive).
Businesses expect more revenue but still will not spend
The British Chambers of Commerce’s latest survey finds nearly half of firms expect turnover to rise over the next year, yet investment intentions remain stuck at a post-pandemic low. That gap is the real story, not the headline optimism. Owners can see demand improving while still deciding the risk of committing capital isn’t worth it yet, especially with the Autumn Budget due later this month. Confidence about revenue and confidence about the future are not the same thing, and conflating them leads to bad planning. If your own forecast assumes a rosier year ahead, check whether your investment plan reflects that belief, or whether you are actually hedging against a budget you haven’t seen yet.
Read the article here.
Working constantly is not dedication, it might be burnout
A piece from the therapy practice Collectively Tangled makes a point every founder should sit with: the behaviours of burnout look almost identical to the behaviours of entrepreneurship itself. Working long hours looks like dedication. Thinking about work constantly looks like ownership. Taking on one more thing looks like what needs to happen right now. Founders have fewer natural stopping points than employees, so the warning signs rarely look like warning signs. They look like a normal Tuesday. The useful question isn’t whether you’re working hard. It’s whether “temporary” has become your permanent operating mode without you noticing.
Read the article here.
Most loyalty programmes measure enrolment, not actual loyalty
New research from Braze finds that only 4 per cent of US consumers stay enrolled in a loyalty programme because they genuinely like the brand. The rest are banking perks, staying because membership is free, or barely engaging at all. That is a useful gut check for anyone running a scheme and quoting member numbers as a success metric. Enrolment measures convenience, not affection. Real loyalty shows up in behaviour that costs the customer something: paying a bit more, waiting a bit longer, recommending you without being asked. If your loyalty numbers look strong but repeat purchase and referral do not, you aren’t measuring loyalty. You’re measuring how low the bar was to join.
Read the article here.
Being the cheapest is a title you can lose overnight
The Independent reports that Tesco has beaten Asda to be named the cheapest UK supermarket for the first time this year, based on a basket of 219 popular branded products. Aldi and Lidl remain the cheapest overall, as they almost always are, but the Tesco-Asda swap is the interesting part. Being known as the cheap option is a position you have to keep earning, not one you get to keep by reputation. Shoppers compare prices constantly now, and the gap between being seen as affordable and actually being the cheapest closes or opens every month. If price is your main pitch, somebody is tracking whether you’re still telling the truth.
Read the article here.
Tired leaders are not just unlucky, they are a company risk
A new Harvard Business Review study of over 1,000 US managers and executives finds sleep deprivation remains widespread among leaders, many of whom underestimate how much fatigue affects their own judgement. The more interesting finding is cultural, not personal. The research suggests the problem is less about individual habits and more about what a workplace rewards: if leaders praise people for working through exhaustion, that becomes the behaviour everyone else copies, tiredness included. A founder who brags about four hours of sleep isn’t demonstrating commitment. They’re setting the organisation’s real policy on rest, whatever the handbook says.
Read the article here (paywalled, Archive).
|
The Numbers
Week on week, to 10 October 2026. Figures that move what your business is worth.
A settled week in the numbers, with Bitcoin the biggest mover at 1.96 per cent down.
|
That’s your eight for this week. If there’s a thread through it, it’s this: the number on the surface is rarely the whole truth, whether that’s a confidence survey, a loyalty scheme or a leader’s own sense of how they’re doing. Look one layer down. Have a great week ahead.
Cheers!
Adam